Japan-based Astellas Pharma Inc. (TSE: 4503) confirmed on Friday the US District Court for the District of Delaware ruling that all asserted claims of the 8,106,183+ADs- 8,524,883+ADs- and RE47301 patents for LEXISCAN(R) (regadenoson injection) 0.4mg/mL are not infringed.
The patent infringement trial involved one Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) filer, US-based pharmaceutical and medical device company Hospira, Inc. According to Astellas, Hospira is requesting permission from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to manufacture and commercialise a generic LEXISCAN(R) product before expiration of the LEXISCAN(R) patents. Astellas said that it plans to appeal the decision and to take legal action to prevent Hospira from launching generic LEXISCAN(R) pending resolution of the appeal.
Astellas said that it is reviewing the potential financial impacts of this district court decision for the fiscal year ending 31 March 2023.
Hansa Biopharma submits imlifidase Biologics License Application to FDA
T-MAXIMUM Pharmaceutical receives IND approval to start Phase II trial of MT027 for rGBM
Alvotech and Teva secure US launch date for Eylea biosimilar AVT06
Egetis initiates rolling US NDA for Emcitate in MCT8 deficiency
Abbott's Amplatzer Piccolo Delivery System receives US FDA clearance and CE Mark
Amphix Bio announces initial closing of USD12.5m seed financing round
BiBBInstruments reports additional US orders during targeted EndoDrill GI launch
Sanofi's efdoralprin alfa receives EU orphan designation for AATD-related emphysema
Black Buffalo partners with Sanova to support regulatory strategy and scientific innovation
Nicox completes key data package for NCX 470 NDA submissions
Immusoft's ISP-002 granted US FDA Orphan Drug Designation in MPS II
Orphan Therapeutics Accelerator signs MoU with Fondazione Telethon
Bioretec wins FDA breakthrough status for biodegradable orthopaedic DrillPin
Amferia raises EUR3.5m to advance antimicrobial wound-care platform
Sobi s Aspaveli marketing authorisation receives positive European regulatory opinion